Nature reported that a major AI conference was flooded by AI-generated peer reviews – irony aside, this presents a fairly troubling development: Science ought to be the place where we do real discovery, have honest discourse, and further our collective understanding. That is, not a place for AI slop.
Pangram’s analysis revealed that around 21% of the ICLR peer reviews were fully AI-generated, and more than half contained signs of AI use.
↗ Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written fully by AI
